| |
The Early Genesis Chapters - An
Opinion
As Christians, does it really make any difference what we
believe about the first nine
chapters of Genesis? From a modern perspective, it all seems to
be prehistoric myth.
Maybe
it's just a Jewish attempt to account for those years shrouded
in the mist of man's Neolithic brain. The creation accounts, the
Garden of Eden story, Noah's flood and such, fly in the face of
scientific findings. Are they are merely superimposed morality
plays on, or supposed explanations of, the mysteries of nature?
Many Christians today either do not believe those accounts, or
fit them to the latest science. They think they have pretty
solid theological views about the birth, death and resurrection
of Jesus Christ. They believe in the Trinity, the virgin birth,
the atoning sacrifice of Christ and justification by faith
alone. They believe Jesus is coming again. They even go for the
latest end-times rapture fads. They believe in a real heaven and
sometimes they even believe in a real hell, but they just don't
go for that old-time Genesis history. They don't have trouble
with every word, just the ones that require faith.
For instance, no one wants to get rid of "In the beginning God
created the heavens and the earth", even Carl Sagan-types. It
has a cool ring to it. Everyone likes "and the
earth was formless and void". It's got that
you-can-make-anything-you-want-of-it feel.
Another keeper: "Then God said, Let us make man in our image,
according to our
likeness" and God created man in his own image, in the image of
God He created him; male and female he created them." Billions
of people believe in this in one form or another. The facts are
hard to deny. There is an earth and the sky. There are males and
females. This doesn't take much faith. The Biblical story could
be interpreted pretty much any way you want to, except for all
the other details given in Genesis.
If we have differences of opinion on say, just how long it took
God to create the stuff
it says He created in six days, should we work these differences
out? Is there a right
viewpoint and anyone who comes against it is divisive, or
stupid? On my part, I think
there is a right viewpoint, and I don't think it will be found
in the latest findings of
science.
I like science; don't get me wrong. But there's something
sinister about all this
newfangled knowledge we've been getting lately, right at the
time the church is becoming apostate. I don't trust science to
tell me what the Bible is really saying. I trust God and the
rest of the Scriptures.
So, if you're one of those test-tube thumpers who can't make
heads nor tails of the
scriptures until you see it published in Science magazine or
proven in a lab experiment, well, I say you're on very thin ice
with God. But if you're like me, a believer that just doesn't
have all the facts but are willing to believe what the Bible
says, we're on common ground.
I once read a book by a Big Bang theologist by the name of Dr.
Hugh Ross. It appears
that he is a spokesman for the modern trend of believing in a
billions-of-years-old
universe with an earth and stars formed per the latest
astronomic theories. He
stereotypes believers in a literal six-day creation as harsh and
unloving. This loving
and tolerant man says that these "fundies" blow away many people
from coming to Christ because of their intolerant attitude (or
just plain stupidity). But as Mark Twain once said, "Science is
so wonderful" one gets such wholesale return of conjecture from
such little investment of fact. Mark Twain was as unimpressed
with scientists as he was with preachers, but do you think Dr.
Ross would side with him against scientists? Oh no, let's both
go after the preacher of righteousness who bases his doctrine on
Genesis.
NavPress (you know, the Navigators who have you memorize
Scriptures), are all for the Big Bang theory and an old
universe. They cannot deny science, can they? Science more than
proves that the earth is old and any attempts argue against
facts science are barbarian. They say, along with Dr. Ross and
the other syncretic creationists, it is really sad to see
Christians arguing over such things, bringing disunity to the
body of Christ, when we could all get along if you would only
agree with us. What seems to escape their attention is that once
you start down the path of scrutinizing the Bible by the
torchlight of modern thinking, both secular scientists and
spiritual saints will laugh at you. Neither one of them goes for
halfway measures.
Let's face the facts: None of us were here when it all started,
including the writer of
Genesis. Trying to explain away the account of Genesis by
pretending that someone is
standing on earth somewhere and getting things all mixed up,
like when the sun and moon were created, only confuses matters
more and argues against the inspiration of the Holy Spirit; as
though God could be limiting his own viewpoint during creation.
The vast words, "In the beginning God..." go beyond time and
space, so why try to box something up that only God knows? True,
as He creates, time and space become by stages (six days) what
we know as reality.
Why would we think we can examine
this creation with our blunt, finite minds and come up with a
tenable theory as to how this all happened? But we do, so now,
"In the beginning was the Dot, and the Dot blew up and made all
this stuff by sheer accident... or, maybe an intelligent force
was directing the particles... or, maybe there is another
parallel universe...or...?
That is cutting-edge
science!
Chris Simonson 3/31/2006 |
| |
 |
Help The Wicked?
2 Chron. 19:2 "...should you help the wicked and love those who
hate the Lord and so bring wrath on yourself from the Lord?"
Looking
at Christianity today, you would think that being a Christian is
little more than helping the wicked. This is variously called
"loving them into the kingdom", "friendship evangelism", blah,
blah. The wicked don't mind it too much when you go along with
their agenda and tell them Jesus loves them. Many of them, if
they are not laughing at this attempt to preach Jesus, actually
think they are saved. But when you speak up against their
schemes and warn them of their end, they get a little hostile.
According to the Bible, we should warn them (Ezekiel 3:18-19,
33:8-9, Ephesians 5:11, Colossians 1:28, 1 Thessalonians
5:14). We should certainly not justify them (Proverbs 17:15). If
they thirst, we should give them something to drink, and other
such things as they may have need, but we should not certainly
give them the impression that God smiles down on them
lovingly. If we love them, we should do so with a concern that
they must repent of their evil, even if they don't know what's
coming. If we love them just the way they are, meaning we love
their personality, their looks, their self apart from Christ,
then we should wonder whether we love them at all with Christ's
love. He was not one to play around with men's lies.
Neither was Micaiah, an Old Testament prophet. He was admonished
to lie to Ahab, to
please him like the other prophets he gathered to himself, much
as do modern churchgoers gather teachers to themselves (2
Timothy 4:3). But Ahab knew that Micaiah prophesied the truth,
evil as it was, and it infuriated him. So he finally had to hear
the bad news as Micaiah prophesied:
"Therefore hear the word of the LORD; I saw the LORD sitting
upon his throne, and all the host of heaven standing on his
right hand and on his left. And the LORD said, Who shall entice
Ahab king of Israel, that he may go up and fall at Ramothgilead,
And one spake saying after this manner, and another saying after
that manner. Then there came out a spirit, and stood before the
LORD, and said, I will entice him. And the LORD said unto him,
Wherewith? And he said, I will go out, and be a lying spirit in
the mouth of all his prophets. And the LORD said, Thou shalt
entice him, and thou shalt also prevail: go out, and do even
so. Now therefore, behold, the LORD hath put a lying spirit in
the mouth of these thy prophets, and the LORD hath spoken evil
against thee." 2 Chronicles 18:19-22.
Ouch. There's a lot of theology woven into these verses, but the
meaning is pretty
clear: Ahab has been deceived by his own prophets and will
suffer the consequences. Our beginning verse, however, was
against an otherwise good king, Jehoshaphat. He had formed an
alliance with Ahab and this displeased God.
We should warn the wicked, not side with them. This does not
mean we have nothing to do with them, but we must never partake
of their evil works and we must never forget our debt to warn
them of the coming judgment.
Chris Simonson 3/30/2006 |
| |
 |
How To Get Away With It
How
do you maintain a belief system that there is a God who will do
away with most of society violently, condemning them to eternal
torment (and the founder of that religion having said it is most
important to use the warning of eternal torment to cause them to
repent of their wickedness), and not have that society somewhat
hostile to you?
Answer: You get a tax-exempt status, you buy property, put up a
building, get people inside the building and tell them nice
stories that mean old God went away when you stepped up to the
plate.
Chris Simonson 3/29/2006 |
| |
 |
MacArthur VS Dobson: an excerpt
from a message by Phil Johnson
Phil Johnson, who is an elder at Grace Community Church in Sun
Valley, California,
transcribed part of a sermon titled "The Foolishness of
Preaching the Gospel", by pastor John MacArthur. In this
excerpt, John MacArthur rebuts Dr. James Dobson (Focus on the
Family) for his suggestion that the preaching of the gospel is
ineffective compared to using political legislation to change
men's hearts:
"Frankly, if I can just speak frankly, you can see the effect of
this on James Dobson's own broadcasts. You can listen for weeks,
and you'll hear messages about the practical side of parenting;
you'll hear lots of discussion about political and moral issues;
you'll hear shrill warnings about how the moral fiber of our
society is unraveling more and more all the time; you'll hear
social critiques and calls for moral reform; you'll hear
interviews with people about all kinds of things, including
non-Christians who happen to be our allies in political issues;
you'll occasionally hear references to God and the Bible, but if
you ever hear any actual Bible teaching--it's rare--and rarely
will you hear the name of Jesus Christ mentioned, and almost
never will you hear a clear and uncompromising presentation of
the Gospel. The Gospel is inevitably stifled when your main
concern becomes political issues, and I frankly think that is a
dangerous and
wrong-headed direction for any Christian ministry to go--it
subtly undermines the Gospel. It's the very thing Paul is
warning about here in 1 Corinthians 1. That kind of strategy
diverts the focus of Christian people who listen to and trusts
that ministry--they become concerned about and consumed with
things other than the Gospel. Now consider the irony of all of
this: Focus on the Family has accused ministries of ours of
advocating apathy and silence, but they are the ones who have
been silent on the issues that matter most. They are the ones
who have abandoned the foolishness of
preaching and opted instead for worldly methods and worldly
wisdom--they are the ones that are out-of-step with Scripture."
For Phil's sermons and messages go to: www.SwordandTrowel.org
Chris Simonson 3/28/2006 |
| |
 |
Nauseating Theology
Prescribed by churches Romish and the like, our world-recognized
courses can
redirect
your faith into systemized sophistry. All-seminaries approved,
including those who claim to have no dealings with Rome. Feel
free to spend endless hours poring over volumes of church
fathers' ravings and rarebits. Learn how to turn your conscience
into "the other spread" by autodidactic emulsification of
discernment. These courses are guaranteed to make you a
proselyte of Biblical contortions, overawing 99% of your
competition, leaving them completely baffled and un-edified.
Covered subjects are:
1. Nature of God in 333 volumes
2. Nature of angels in 444 volumes
3. Nature of demons in 555 volumes
4. Nature of man in 666 volumes
Length of course depends on when you die and how long you can
hold on to your sanity/integrity. Once you have established your
willingness to engage in endless debates, the Church will either
give you your own bishopric (if you learn to ape them
correctly), or alternately, have prelates anathematize you (once
you hang yourself with words). Only the most modern and
insidious condemnation techniques will be used to shipwreck your
faith.
(As a healthy alternative to the above, one should try faith in
God's promises and commands as given through Jesus Christ and
his apostles. Although they are plain words, they are useful for
serving God in truth. Also guaranteed to relieve
theology-induced nausea).
Chris Simonson 3/27/2006 |
| |
 |
|
Who Will Save You?
Each religion in the world has its
own outward rituals to please some god or to
secure
their righteousness and each one thinks he is right. However,
while the way of every man is right in his own eyes, there is
One who judges the heart.
What He finds in men’s hearts and how He weighs the thoughts of
men are radically different from what the world esteems. The Son
of God bore testimony to us that the hearts of men are
desperately wicked above all things. It is not any sort of food
that a person puts into his mouth that will condemn him but what
comes forth from the heart; and from the heart comes evil
thoughts, murder, adultery, other sexual immorality, theft,
false testimony, and slander.
Change your heart and mind, and be forgiven. Do not be satisfied
with a debased nature. The natural man will be destroyed because
he follows the desires of the flesh; but a mind like Christ’s
will be renewed by the Word of God. Oh, stubborn man, who will
save you? None other than Jesus Christ, the Son of the Most High
God. Anyone who trusts in Him will never be put to shame.
Matt Simonson 3/24/2006 |
| |
 |
|
The High Court
I dreamed I stood in the court of
God at the close of this age. No trial on earth
before
and, indeed, all the courts combined together since the
beginning of the world, were not worthy of the intensity and
scrutiny of this high court. There was no jury nor lawyers. Only
the Judge sat and regarded every act, every cause, every
argument for and against the one on trial. I discovered that it
was me who was on trial. And not only me, but the entire human
race was simultaneously judged, because the One judging can do
such things.
As the evidence mounted, I could
see that the Judge was fair in his consideration. He saw only
the truth. I was justified only because of things that happened
to me, not something I caused. If it had been left up to me,
then I clearly saw how condemned I should be. But then I could
see that, outside any self-will and apart from my disposition, I
had been so influenced and enabled to do good things, that I
stood the test of this ultimate trial. I saw it was purely by
the mercy of the Same One who was Judge, that I had been
prepared for This Day.
The bad things I had done had been
paid for by the death of the One who judged. I saw that most of
the ones being judged had neglected to take care of their evil
lives while they had the chance. Many of those who professed to
know the Judge personally were likewise condemned for their
deeds of hypocrisy, for their words of judgment against
themselves, and for their lack of care for others. I myself was
just barely saved, but I was saved, and I was rejoicing along
with the others in my Lord and Savior; but those condemned were
weeping and wailing even before their punishment began.
Then I woke up.
Then I read:
When the Son of man shall come in
his glory, and all the holy angels with him, then shall he sit
upon the throne of his glory. Before him shall be gathered all
nations, and he shall separate them one from another, as a
shepherd divides his sheep from the goats: And he shall set the
sheep on his right hand, but the goats on the left.
Then shall the King say to those on
his right hand, "Come, you blessed of my Father, inherit the
kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world: For I
was hungry, and you gave me food; I was thirsty, and you gave me
drink; I was a stranger, and you took me in; naked, and you
clothed me; I was sick, and you visited me; I was in prison, and
you came to me."
Then shall the righteous answer
him, saying, "Lord, when did we see you hungry, and feed you? or
thirsty, and give you drink? When did we see you a stranger, and
take you in? or naked, and clothe you? Or when did we see you
sick, or in prison, and come to you?"
And the King shall answer and say
to them, "Of a truth I say to you, insofar as you have done it
to one of the least of these my brothers, you have done it to
me."
Then shall he say also to those on
the left hand, "Depart from me, ye cursed, into everlasting
fire, prepared for the devil and his angels: For I was an
hungered, and ye gave me no meat: I was thirsty, and ye gave me
no drink: I was a stranger, and ye took me not in: naked, and ye
clothed me not: sick, and in prison, and ye visited me not. Then
shall they also answer him, saying, "Lord, when did we see Thee
hungry, or thirsty, or a stranger, or naked, or sick, or in
prison, and did not minister unto Thee?"
Then shall he answer them, saying,
"Verily I say unto you, Inasmuch as ye did it not to one of the
least of these, ye did it not to me."
And these shall go away into
everlasting punishment: but the righteous into life eternal.
Matthew 25:31-46.
Chris Simonson 3/23/2006 |
| |
 |
|
Where will
you
spend eternity?
During your life there is but this
one question that will matter in the spectrum of eternity. All
creation and even our own conscience bear witness to this
reality. We did not bring anything into this world and we will
leave with nothing from it; God
has
given us 72 years, on average, on this Earth and the decisions
we make determine where we will spend eternity.
Heaven is spoken of in the Bible as
a city of gold that glimmers like glass, lined with precious
stones, seas of crystal, where the tree of everlasting life
grows; everywhere is the presence of almighty God and His Son,
who will reign for eternity. There will be no death in Heaven,
nor pain, or suffering; one will not kill another, lie, steal or
covet. There will be unspeakable joy at being in the holy
presence of God.
Since Creation, men of faith have
looked forward to one day being in the Kingdom of God; also
since the beginning of man the Bible speaks of sin, and of us
violating God’s commandments. The Bible says since Adam, sin and
death entered the world, and all of Creation bears the mark of
death: all living things perish eventually, animals grow up and
devour each other, mountains deteriorate, trees decay and return
to the soil and kings and civilizations rise up and fall back to
the earth from whence they sprung. Since Adam’s fall, sin
entered the heart of man; men have risen up and slain millions
of their fellow human beings, from the Egyptian and Roman
empires to Stalin and Hitler.
The Bible says that "as it is
written, There is none righteous, no, not one; 11. There are
none that understand, There are none that seek after God; 12.
They have all turned aside, they are together become
unprofitable; There is none that does good, no, not, so much
as one: 13. Their throat is an open sepulcher; With their
tongues they have used deceit: The poison of asps is under their
lips: 14. Whose mouth is full of cursing and bitterness: 15.
Their feet are swift to shed blood; 16. Destruction and misery
are in their ways; 17. And the way of peace have they not known:
18. There is no fear of God before their eyes."
Men backstab, they lie, they cheat
and steal, they covet whatever they don’t have; they put great
trust in things of this earth which are only temporary and will
die eventually. Men build for themselves monuments and vast
kingdoms, priding themselves on their intellectual achievements
and the power of their hands.
To suppress their conscience, which
constantly bears witness of Christ, the law of God and the
coming judgment, men often run to substances as alcohol or
drugs, others pursue careers and money with all their might and
some move in political arenas to legislate either for or against
morality. Worse yet, other men become consumed in religious
traditions devoid of Christ, which only produces confusion, all
in an attempt to ease a conscience that does not allow them to
sleep at night. These men excuse those who are like-minded in
sin and at the same time they sear their conscience by accusing
those who follow after Christ.
The wrath of God is against all
men, for "all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God.",
and God will judge all men who reject the only way to Heaven and
salvation from sin, Jesus Christ.
God, being holy, demands holiness
from all men. As a result of sin, all men fall short of God’s
holiness and will be cast into Hell for eternity with the devil
and his angels to everlasting torment; the Bible describes Hell
as constant weeping, gnashing of teeth, utter horrors,
darkness... separation from God.
In the Old Testament of the Bible,
we see a sacrificial system in which man sinned, then had to go
to the priest and brings an offering, an unblemished lamb that
was innocent of the sin; the lamb’s throat was slashed and the
lamb’s blood was sprinkled on those who were guilty of sin. This
process was actually a foretelling of Christ, who was the
fulfillment of the Mosaic Law. The Bible also refers that only
God can forgive sin and that God would provide himself a
sacrifice.
Christ, the Lamb of God, who had no
sin and was guilty of none, was this sacrifice; He humbled
Himself below the angels to become a man, like you and me.
Through the virgin birth He did not carry the sinful seed of
man; He walked and talked with the priests and the elders and
was perfect, having no sin. Jesus, as man and God, was charged
with a crime He did not commit, was found guilty of sin that He
did not do and was sentenced to immediate death by a judge who
knew His innocence. Christ experienced being beaten beyond
recognition, being spit upon by His people and was whipped
horribly. He was led to His death as the Scriptures say "as a
lamb being led to the slaughter"; he was crucified and all men’s
sins were forgiven in the moment of His death. The wrath of God
was poured out on His own son, whom was innocent and whom was
the sacrifice for forgiveness of all the sins of the world.
Jesus Christ rose again on the
third day after his death; He conquered death, and told his
disciples to go unto the ends of the earth with this gospel, to
warn all men of the coming judgment. During Jesus’ earthly
ministry, He said, "I am the way, the truth and the life, and no
one comes to God without me.", referring to his own death,
burial and resurrection.
People have pursued idols, men and
other gods in an attempt to somehow ease their conscience,
hoping to find forgiveness from their sins, but Jesus is the one
and only prophet, priest and king that has provided forgiveness
of sin; He commands that every man, woman and child must accept
Him as Lord, and to obey His commandments. To reject Christ is
to reject his Lordship over your life; one may say "I have
received Christ...", but if they do not follow His commandments
they are a liar and truth of God is not in them, according to
the Scriptures. It is by grace, through faith that we are saved,
and that not of ourselves but as a gift from God; our human
attempts at righteousness are wicked and defiled before the holy
God.
Receiving Christ is to receive Him
as Lord, in reverence and fear of the one who has power to cast
into hell; repentance, confession of sin and obedience to Christ
through His word are the results of true salvation and are proof
of the presence of the Spirit of God. True conversion sparks a
craving to read the Bible, which in turn produces a blazing
faith. Rejection of Christ will lead to eternal damnation, which
is separation from God. To reject Christ is to reject the bridge
of mediation between God and man, and the weight of your own
sins will pull you down into the abyss. Many are there that have
chosen to reject Christ, and in an attempt to build for
themselves a haven on this earth in that approximate 72 years,
they have ignored eternity and have been irresponsible with the
greatest decision.
The question you must ask yourself,
in the quietness of your own heart, is where will I spend
eternity?
Steven 3/22/2006 |
| |
 |
|
I Read
Recently ...
... where a man was arrested and jailed for warning people that
a bomb was going to explode at a riverside café. The bomb did
explode and killed several and injured dozens. Actually, he was
not arrested because he warned anyone; he was jailed because he
was right. There were several witnesses against him, who
testified that he had upset them. They had initially been
offended and told the man to leave the property, but afterward
figured he was doubtless the bomber. Others, who were not so
sure, nonetheless felt that he should have been more compelling
in his warning. One witness was reported as saying “He actually
drove people away from himself instead of winning them to his
side.”
Either way, the public has demanded justice.
Many people have been stoned, burned at the stake and worse, for
the same offense this man committed. They are prophets and
witnesses for the truth. They warned others and it came to pass
just as they said. Somehow, they are seen as the guilty
party. They are tried and condemned. The faithful and true
witness, Jesus Christ, was crucified for his efforts. Jesus
warned everyone there is a day coming in which the world will be
judged in righteousness. He ought to know: He is the Judge.
He warns because he wants men and women to be delivered from the
only judgment befitting to unbelievers: “Depart from me, you
workers of iniquity, into the fire of hell prepared for the
devil and his angels.” This tends to upset them. They are at
ease, dining at the riverside, enjoying life. Many friends
surround them, assuring them that all is well. If there is a
God, he loves them, they say. These friends even call themselves
Christians. They especially hate the ones whom God sends by to
warn the carefree consumers. They tell themselves and their
friends that sitting around doing nothing but enjoying God’s
creation is another word for “love.”
My friend, are you sitting at the riverside enjoying the good
things of life? Does your conversation about God and his love
center around your easy lifestyle? Do you hate it when someone
warns you about the imminent explosion of the beautiful dining
facilities? Then you really ought to re-examine your
faith. Maybe it is not based on truth, but on comfort level.
Chris
Simonson 3/21/2006 |
| |
 |
|
End
Times According to Paul

We may think to
ourselves that Paul was not into end-times stuff as much as John
or Peter or Daniel. By thinking this, we cut ourselves loose
from the plain teaching of the New Testament that there is a
judgment after death, and that’s the final wrap. In his usual
clever methods of deception, Satan uses the holy scriptures as a
smoke screen for his real intents. He just wants our attention
off salvation and onto something else. He assures us we are
saved no matter what and that it’s time to go onto bigger and
better things, like eschatology (end-times stuff). By doing
this, he makes our salvation unsteady and we focus on things
other than godliness in Christ Jesus. This has been proven over
and over again by various sects and cults that pop up whenever a
thousand years goes by, or a big meteor shower or comet shows up
unexpectedly, or somebody gets a message from God.
Paul says to the
Thessalonians, "Let no one deceive you in any way, for the Day
of the Lord will not come unless the apostasy comes first and
the man of sin is revealed, the son of destruction." He does not
go on to speak of Hal Lindsey-type prophesies or other pop
theology, but he explains very carefully that God will send upon
them (those who are perishing) a deluding influence in order
that they might believe what is false.
We may think to
ourselves that we know what 2 Thess. 2:7 means where it says
"until he is taken out of the way." Pop theology says that this
is the secret rapture of the church. The holy scriptures in no
wise say this. This is a fabrication using wishful thinking and
several scriptures relating to the visible, only, coming of
Christ. That’s why the Greek text calls the second coming the
"appearance" and not the "disappearance."
But let’s say you
just don’t believe any of this and want to hope that you will be
raptured out of here before anything bad starts to happen. On
what are you placing your hope? Are you ready? Are you of those
who think they are saved and yet they are so locked into this
world that even if there were a rapture, the Lord himself
couldn’t drag you up into the sky because you got your arms
locked around the things of this world? And why do you find
yourself in this fashion? Isn’t it precisely because of the
doctrines you hold about the end times?
You probably find
yourself absorbed in things that are totally unrelated to
salvation in Jesus Christ, and yet you feel that God has called
you to do them anyway. Let’s say you go around trying to sell
your fellow Christians life insurance, or annuities, or legal
advice, or real estate, or automobiles, or automobile insurance,
or...you get the drift. You are a modern-day American Christian
whose hope lies in the things of the earth and you focus others’
attention on you and your false hopes. You run the youth groups
and are active in organizing all the church’s activities. You
are a Sunday school teacher and the pastor lets you preach
whenever he is on his vacations to Tahiti and Barbados. You can
really shine.
But you hate the
gospel of Jesus Christ. Oh sure, you believe in the four
spiritual laws. You know that Jesus came into the world to save
sinners and that God loves you. You even believe that Jesus died
on the cross and that he rose again on the third day. You know
all of this, but you still hate the gospel. If you really
thought that you were saved by the gospel, then why are you so
angry when someone presents it to you in a Biblical form that
shows you that you must repent in order to be saved? That’s the
gospel that Jesus Christ himself preached.
No, you want to
give intellectual assent to a few things that Christ did for you
because he thinks so highly of you. Or, if you like the gospel
so much, why do you spend a fortune making yourself comfortable
here and pleasing your flesh, and then giving a pittance to the
Lord’s work? You base your entire life on this misunderstanding.
And in order to remove the true gospel of repentance from your
mind, you think a lot about the rapture and everything that
happens after you are out of here. You can be a distant observer
and judge of events then, even as you are now, engrossed with
holy entertainment.
Now you may say to
yourself, this man is brutal and crude. He should be tender and
gentle with my conscience, like Robert Schuller or Pope
what’s-his-name. Let me speedily add that I trust you are not a
follower of either of these men, but if you are, please
reconsider your salvation. Tenderness and gentleness await those
who call upon the Lord out of a pure heart. But, as Paul says,
"If any man does not love the Lord Jesus, let him be accursed."
Not all men have
faith, even though they take great pains to assure themselves
they do. They spend their days on theological issues that they
cannot prove and that lead to doubtful disputations. They are
ever anxious to tell you about some new accomplishment their
church has accomplished (like winning the inner-city basketball
championship). They will tell you that 500 people were saved
during that conference (they have signed cards to prove it).
And, they are very nice.
The end times are
upon us, brethren. Of course, this has been said since the
inception of the church, but it is the way it is. One or two
thousand years to the Lord is like a couple of days to us. But
the end could come suddenly, once the apostasy has reached its
fullness. One after another of the big-name churches have fallen
away. The best indicator is their acceptance of homosexuals. It
starts with ordaining women, then goes to lesbians. By default,
male homosexuals are also included.
Mark those churches
who love wickedness and have nothing to do with them. If they
ask you, tell them to repent. Don’t even attend their end-times
conferences or their plays or their spin-the-bottle fellowships.
That’s why the end-times scriptures were given to us. So we
could know when things are happening and what to do. If we can’t
repent, then we are of the class: "in order that they may be
judged who did not believe the truth, but took pleasure in
wickedness."
But we should
always give thanks to God for you, brethren beloved by the Lord,
because God has chosen you from the beginning for salvation
through sanctification by the Spirit and faith in the truth. And
it was for this He called you through our gospel, that you may
gain the glory of our Lord Jesus Christ. So then, brethren,
stand firm and hold to the traditions which you were taught,
whether by word of mouth or by letter from us. Now may our Lord
Jesus Christ Himself and God our Father, who has loved us and
given us eternal comfort and good hope by grace, comfort and
strengthen your hearts in every good work and word. Finally,
brethren, pray for us that we may spread the word of the Lord
rapidly, and that it be glorified, just as it was with you. 2
Thess 2.
Chris Simonson
3/20/2006 |
| |
 |
Saint
Patrick's Day
Patrick was born in 387 A.D. and is believed to have died on
March 17th, 493 A.D.
He
was born near Kilpatrick, Scotland and around 16 years old was
kid-napped and enslaved by Irish slavers and taken to Ireland.
His new master instructed him to tend sheep in the valley of the
Braid and on the isolated slopes of Slemish.
While so employed, Patrick discovered the fear of the Lord and
the solace of prayer: “and His fear increased in me more and
more, and the faith grew in me, and the spirit was roused, so
that, in a single day, I have said as many as a hundred prayers,
and in the night nearly the same, so that whilst in the woods
and on the mountain, even before the dawn, I was roused to
prayer and felt no hurt from it, whether there was snow or ice
or rain; nor was there any slothfulness in me, such as I see
now, because the Spirit was then fervent within me” (quoted from
Patrick’s “Confessio”)
During his captivity, Patrick acquired an extensive knowledge of
the Celtic tongue, in which he would one day announce the glad
tidings of Salvation; in addition to
language he became familiar with the local pagan beliefs through
Milchu, his master,
whom was a druidical high priest. After 6 years of being a
slave, Patrick escaped and fled back to Britain; he attended
Martin’s Monastery for many years to learn more of God and His
Word; he felt a tremendous burden to preach the Gospel of Jesus
Christ to the pagan people of Ireland who’d once enslaved him.
Upon landing on the Emerald Isle,
his first act of ministry was to travel to Dalriada,
where he had once been a slave; he paid the full price of his
ransom to his pagan,
former master and bestowed to him the blessing of the Gospel of
Jesus Christ.
Thus is the story of Patrick, a man whom had a hunger and thirst
for God and His
word, which led him back to his painful past of slavery to
conquer false gods with the awesome Gospel of Jesus Christ. A
classic illustration of an individual whom did not fear man but
God, and answered the call to repentance.
There is a myth that says Patrick
banished the snakes from Ireland; in reality, the
devilish and pagan doctrines that once enslaved the Irish people
were silenced by the Gospel of Jesus Christ, brought to
Ireland’s shores with boldness, by a man of faith.
Steven 3/17/2006 |
| |
 |
Don't Call Yourself Gay If You're
Not
If we look at the definition of gay, the dictionary says:
"Joyous and lively; merry; happy; lighthearted."
Homosexuals call themselves gay and expect others to use this
term. However, in so doing they destroy the primary meaning of
the word, because they are not gay though they pretend to be.
They fake joy, happiness, etc.
In reality they are depressed,
heavyhearted, anxious, easily offended, etc. They blame this on
everything but their own depraved minds. They think to
themselves they are loved by God and even call themselves
Christian. They expect society to go along with their stories of
love between themselves, and today, most of society buys into
the lie.
Many religious persons call themselves Christians and expect
others to use this term. However, in so doing they destroy the
meaning of the word, because they are not like Christ at all
even though they pretend to be. They fake love, kindness,
humility, etc.
In reality, they are irreligious,
not devoted to Jesus Christ or his gospel. They blame this on
everything but their own unbelief. They think to themselves they
are loved by God and even call themselves gay. They expect the
church and the rest of society to go along with their stories of
love between themselves, and today, most of society buys into
the lie.
If we look at the definition of "Christian", the dictionary
says: "Of Jesus Christ or his teachings... of or representing
Christians or Christianity."
Don't call yourself Christian if you're not.
Chris Simonson 3/16/2006 |
| |
 |
Let's Pick on Samson
A foolish generation mocks the man of God. They mock because
they do not
recognize
God's holiness as expressed by the man of God any more than they
recognize God Himself. Samson is a questionable figure as far as
holiness goes, but he was holy unto the Lord, a Nazarite from
his birth. Because Samson's holiness is a little less than
sterling, let us look quickly at two prophets whose holiness is
indisputable, and then get back to mocking Samson.
First, Elisha. Let's look at what happened to some little
children when they mocked him: "And he went up from thence unto
Bethel: and as he was going up by the way, there came forth
little children out of the city, and mocked him, and said unto
him, Go up, thou bald head; go up, thou bald head. And he turned
back, and looked on them, and cursed them in the name of the
LORD. And there came forth two she bears out of the wood, and
tare forty and two children of them." 2 Kings 2:23-24.
Not likely to hear that story in Sunday school! The effete
churchgoer cannot stomach such fare. They are used to the
dainties served by the friends of the world (Psalm 141:4,
Proverbs 23:3).
Second, Elijah the Tishbite: "And Elijah answered and said unto
them, If I be a man of God, let fire come down from heaven, and
consume thee and thy fifty. And the fire of God came down from
heaven, and consumed him and his fifty." 2 Kings 1:12.
It is true that Jesus our Lord did not come into the world to
judge the world but that the world through him might be saved
(John 3:17). For instance, when his disciples James and John saw
the cruel inhospitality of a Samaritan village they said, "Lord,
wilt thou that we command fire to come down from heaven, and
consume them, even as Elijah did?" But he turned, and rebuked
them, and said, "Ye know not what manner of spirit ye are
of. For the Son of man is not come to destroy men's lives, but
to save them." And they went to another village. (Luke 9:54-56).
Nonetheless, prophets are not mocked without penalty. When Jesus
came, he was
mocked and beaten and crucified and did not call down fire, but
rather forgave
them. However, there is coming a Day when all of that will come
into account.
Then vengeance will come from the same Jesus the Lord, who as a
consuming fire
will burn up his enemies with wrath and indignation (2
Thessalonians 1:8, Hebrews 12:29).
Back to Samson: Before he was born, his mom never drank wine or
liquor, nor did
she ever eat anything non-kosher. This meant that Samson was
separated to the
Lord even before he was born. He never cut his hair as far as we
know. He was very religious when it came to that. However, in
sexual matters, he was not so dedicated to Yahweh. Whereas the
Lord said to take no daughters of foreigners, he really, really,
really wanted a Philistine lady whose name we never found
out. His mom and dad were displeased but agreed to do the
customary arrangements to have him married.
The story is short and sad. He never got to have his wife,
because the marriage
was destroyed by her betrayal of his trust. Samson tried to
contend with the
Philistines by posing a riddle, but his wife pulled the rug out
from under him.
At the marriage feast, she wept seven days trying to get the
secret out of him,
because her people had threatened to burn her and her father's
house if she didn't persuade Samson to give up the answer to the
riddle. Instead of trusting in her husband, she feared and
obeyed her friends and family to the ruin of all. When the
Philistines came up with the answer, he knew his wife had
betrayed him. His "anger was kindled."
We should take note of what he said to them: "If ye had not
plowed with my heifer, ye had not found out my riddle." (Judges
14:18).
This is pretty graphic language. They had used his wife for
their own purposes, and she had acquiesced in fear. They took
away Samson's rightful use of his own wife, and he is
acknowledging that his beloved heifer has been turned into
little more than the enemy's draft animal as a result. This is
the way it is in many marriages.
"Husbands, love your wives", we hear the manipulators say, but
they are using our wives against us. There is no love, but fear
of reprisal from the church. The feminist movement has flooded
the churches and we hear weeping for seven days, tears flowing
not from repentance due to rightful fear of God and reverence
towards husbands, but from fear of man and reverence towards
other men (and women).
The wives are not submissive to
their husbands. They feel, because of their pastors' teaching,
that the husbands must be rid of self-interest and
vainglory. They feel it is their duty to reveal this (nag them
with tears if necessary) because the children of their people
have convinced them that this is the Christian thing to do. They
have been assured by their people bad things will happen to them
if they do not turn on their husbands: "lest we burn thee and
thy father's house with fire" or worse, they will be shunned by
the women's social club.
This ought not to be.
Modern society, including the modern churches, mock the man of
God. They use
many devices, the best being reserved to destroy the man's
authority in his own household. As a result, the children turn
out to be twice the child of hell as their parents. As Isaiah
the prophet says, "As for my people, children are their
oppressors, and women rule over them. O my people, they which
lead thee cause thee to err, and destroy the way of thy paths."
Isaiah 3:12 . When people mock the man of God, they mock God
himself, who created them.
What does God do about this? In the story of Samson, He uses the
evil situation of Samson to show his wrath against the
Philistines. As the Bible puts it, "But his father and his
mother knew not that it was of the LORD, that he sought an
occasion against the Philistines: for at that time the
Philistines had dominion over Israel." Judges 14:4. As we read
on in the story, Samson wreaks vengeance on them and they burn
his wife anyway. Instead of being honored as a hero, he is bound
and given to the Philistines by his own brethren, another
mockery. This does not go well for the Philistines. God, mocking
them, has Samson beat down one thousand of them with the jawbone
of an ass.
We know the story of Samson and Delilah, mainly because
Hollywood loves stories
about fornication and adultery. However, even though Delilah
mocks Samson with
her tears, and he loses his eyes and is put to the grindstone,
he has the last victory. He kills more people in his death than
he did during the rest of his life (Judges 16:30). The
Philistines were rejoicing that their god was more powerful than
the Israelite's God, and they were making a show of it by
displaying Samson in a shameful manner. Of course, this is a
type of Christ. And, as a type of Christ, he destroys the house
of their god and them with it. That's what happens when we mock
the man of God.
Our ministry as ambassadors of Christ precludes that we curse
men, but rather
that we bless them. (Romans 12:14). Samson was a man who was
persecuted for
righteousness' sake, just as are the servants of God today.
Although he was
a Judge of Israel and not an ambassador for Christ, this makes
no difference to
the wicked, who will try to thwart God's purposes because they
know that one
of his purposes is to rid the earth of them, because Jesus said,
"The meek
shall inherit the earth." In order to be meek, we must be like
Jesus Christ,
not like the effeminate churchmen of modern society. They
deliver us over to
the world for judgment because they are scared of their own
shadows. They fear
man, not God. No, they mock the man of God and turn against him
as necessary to
maintain their friendship with the world.
Does God sit in heaven and do nothing about this? No, rather, he
has his ambassadors preach the everlasting gospel that warns men
of the coming judgment, and he delivers men if they repent. The
gospel becomes the only tool for providing the power of
salvation to the world. Those who mock the Gospel and say it is
secondary to their gods of religious observance will be surely
put to death.
God, on His part, calls men to
repent of their wickedness and their idolatry. He has the men of
God preach the gospel so other men can decide their eternal
condition: Life, or death.
Much has been done to mock God in these last days. But, the
shame that Jesus
bore on the cross shows us that we too must bear the shame. If
we suffer with
him, we will also reign with him (Romans 8:17). Let us not be
ashamed of the
gospel, even if it is foolishness to the world, because God is
our judge.
"Be not deceived; God is not mocked: for whatsoever a man sows,
that shall he also reap. For he that sows to his flesh shall of
the flesh reap corruption; but he that sows to the Spirit shall
of the Spirit reap life everlasting. And let us not be weary in
well doing: for in due season we shall reap, if we faint not."
Galatians 6:7-9.
Chris Simonson 3/15/2006 |
| |
 |
|
Truth
Once we used to look for the truth.
Some of us. We thought there would be no higher calling, no more
worthy adventure, than to sacrifice anything for truth. We were
told in the public schools that truth was in our textbooks,
given by our teachers. Math was truth, or science was truth,
maybe even social studies were truth.
What we learned, however, was that
social behavior was all we needed to know of the truth. If we
got popular or got high or got sexual adventure or got rich,
those things, and not some objective truth, were the real truth
for us. As our moral boundaries eroded and shifted, we invented
new truths that had been long condemned as lies. But it didn’t
matter: we were taught there is no real truth, only what we make
up in our own minds. So our jails filled up. Our marriages broke
down. Our governments became parodies of law and justice.
Where did all the money and
empowerment for this insanity come from? “Because they rejected
the simple truth, God gave them over to strong deception, that
they might believe a lie.” - the Holy Scriptures. That’s the
truth.
Chris Simonson 3/14/2006 |
| |
 |
|
Life or Death
Death
is trusting in the flesh.
"Open your mind", "there is no God".
You walk the broad path, fool.
Know the world, forget your Lord.
You stain your garment, fool.
Fulfill yourself, He will not see.
You will give account, fool.
Strain a gnat, swallow a camel.
Hypocrite, which is the worse?
Flush the flesh, cover the heart.
Hypocrite, which is crucial?
Keep the world, trade your soul.
Hypocrite, which is vital?
Lose your life, gain true life.
Walk the narrow path, child.
Fight the fight, run the race.
Endure until the end, child.
Hate rebellion, guard from idols;
His angels protect you from the evil one.
Life is believing in Jesus Christ.
Matt Simonson 3/13/2006 |
| |
 |
|
Sunday Special - Gay Rights Rally
March 6, at the Sacramento Capitol,
a rally took place to promote homosexual
agendas
within public schools. There was a parade of many individuals
holding a sign printed with “Keep our schools safe for all”.
However, even more showed up (mostly of Russian descent) holding
signs printed with such things as “Marriage = 1 Man and 1 Woman”
and “Homosexuality is a sin” and “Except ye repent, ye will all
parish” and “Perversion is never safe”.
Also, those in opposition to the sodomites would yell such
things as “Stop Brain Wash!” and “Repent!” every time the group
of perverts would cheer.
Public school teachers brought children from their schools to
make a front as if they were for the children, and had evidently
convinced the children and their parents that they were
supporting some minority group. One public school teacher forbid
the children in his care to take literature from me about how
only Jesus’ blood can wash away the sins of people, including
those who were being punished in the body with AIDS for their
perversion, albeit they must repent.
Some there who were against the perverted meeting, asked me,
“Don’t you support America?”, when I was reluctant to take the
American flag. Caught without words to say, I had to say “I
don’t know”. Then later, a young Russian man asked me: “Do you
want other nations to view Americans as homosexuals?” I think it
was because he saw me standing in the background with my
Christian tracts, and I was not yelling with those in protest.
At the time I had to answer “No.”
What happens when all of America’s legislation says it’s OK for
a man to lie with another man and God says it’s an abomination?
Will they still be asking, “Do you support America?” or, “Do you
want other nations to view Americans as homosexuals?"
If it’s true, I’m not going to
cover it up.
Why did the Russian church respond only, out of hundreds of
churches? Were all the other pastors on vacation when they were
contacted to assemble?
News channel 3 reported on the event, but they reported with a
bias for the homosexual rally. They ended with a woman stating
that nobody was going to be bullied today, then the news channel
showed the cops guarding –as though if the cops weren’t there,
the “bullies” would be let in.
However, this was not the case. These weren’t bullies at all,
but citizens who showed up because a law, which protects those
who would participate in gross sexual immorality, was being
passed. These Christians and US citizens were practicing free
speech as legislation was being passed within the Capitol that
ignored the majority view of the people.
The Lord rebuke them.
Matt Simonson 3/12/2006 |
| |
 |
Report on AB 606 Rally -
Sacramento, CA
AB 606 is a proposed bill authored by Assemblymember Lloyd
Levine which bolsters a
current
law, here in California, which disguises itself as an
"anti-discrimination" law. This bill is now in the California
Senate, awaiting approval. This bill specifically cuts off
funding to school districts that are soft on 'harassment'
against race, nationality, sexual preference (or, reading
between the lines: 'homosexual') or religion, but, it is ok for
school districts to discriminate against Christian students,
citing "separation of church and state".
On Monday, March 6th, 2006, there was a rally at the California
State Capital in support of this bill, about 400 strong,
consisting mainly of pro-homosexual teenagers and naive
school-children.
Dick Otterstead organized with
several, local, Russian Christian fellowships to counter-protest
the homosexuals at the State Capital; they outnumbered the
homosexual rally by a third, but in listening to the KOVR
Sacramento channel 13 news it was the other way around. The
reporter for KOVR, Rafer Weigel, was upset because one of the
Christian Russian counter-protestors, whose English was not
perfect, would not turn around the accidentally mis-spelled,
hand-made sign for them to film; disappointed, Rafer Weigel
cursed and said: "He's not going to turn it around, so we can't
get the shot."
Earlier,
dressed in a bright red devil suit, Dick Otterstead held a sign
that read "Proud supporter of AB 606" on one side and "This way
to Hell" on the other with an arrow pointing toward the
homosexual rally. He marched over to the homosexual rally side
and stood a moment with them, until one of the leaders of the
homosexual group physically assaulted him by grabbing his arm,
trying to prevent him from going forward, all the while trying
to pull down his sign. Seconds later the Capital Police swiftly
escorted Dick back to the counter-protest side.
One Russian grandmother near me protested, calling out in a
thick accent: "How can you pervert our children?", and thus is
the crux of the issue which drove so many Christians to respond.
The homosexuals had bused in elementary-school children from
local school districts to sit on the Capital steps, at
tax-payer's expense, to show support for the homosexual agenda.
The problem with the homosexual movement is that they are not
just satisfied with changing legislation in their favor and
making sure that everyone in this country is sodomized, but now
they are trying to rape the children with their perversions. The
truth be known, as spelled out in yesterday's rally, this bill
is but one more step designed to protect the abominable,
in-your-face, decadent homosexual agenda.
Steven 3/10/2006
March 27th, 2006 - Comment from Rafer Weigel, a reporter for
KOVR news:
"This blogger got several facts wrong regarding me, my reporting
and reactions. At no time did I EVER report that the numbers
were "the other way around". In my report, which clearly this
factually inacurate blogger never saw, I said the numbers were
equal. In the estimation of police, that is what they saw. At no
time did I become "enraged". It is not my job to become enraged
or have an emotional attachment to the material I'm
covering. Only when I'm misquoted and misrepresented by an
irresponsible writer such as this man do I become enraged. The
sign was spelled "fagets" and it would have made good video,
which is all I'm concerned about. We asked the man show it but
he wouldn't. He became paranoid at the request. Fortunately you
did get the words I said correct. But there was no rage behind
it. True to form of many activists--you "spin" the reality how
you wish it to be to further your agenda. In this case it is to
make your position sympathetic in some sort of conspiracy-like
fashion that you and members of your cause are fighting against
in some kind of Don Quixote-like fashion against the masses and
the liberal bias of the press. If you need to do that to pump
your readers up, that's fine. But don't make me or my work a
part of it when it's wrong and inaccurate."
(Mr. Weigel stated in the above
comment that he was not, indeed, 'enraged' so we have made the
following edit to the above blog: 'enraged' has been changed to
'disappointed'.) |
| |
 |
|
How Today's
Gospel Differs From The Gospel - Part Four
Our gospel should be no less
concerned with the attributes of a holy and righteous
God. We
should present the Law in all its glory until the soul
acquiesces to the fear of God. Then we should preach repentance,
a change of life. When the soul is properly prepared by God's
truth, then we should preach faith in Christ. It is not faith in
Christ that is preached today, but faith in some other principle
to which is attached the name of Christ. Then, without any
scriptural backing, today's gospel preaches assurance of
salvation. Today's pastors spend a lot of time on the subject of
assurance of salvation. Maybe the Holy Spirit is convicting some
consciences. After all, isn't that the work of the Spirit? John
16:8. To assuage their conscience so they don't go away, the
pastor presents to them the gospel of easy-believism, hoping to
keep them coming back Sunday after lucrative Sunday.
The only one who can truly assure a person of his salvation is
God himself. He
sends his Holy Spirit into the life of his chosen and they
follow Christ, taking up their cross. As they obey Him, going
places where the flesh does not want to go, He gives them His
assurance. The rich young ruler was left with no assurance. We
do not know whether he ever repented, but that was left out of
history on purpose. Today is the day of salvation, not tomorrow.
If we are called upon to preach Christ, let us preach the cross
and what it means. Let us start with the uniqueness of God, his
holiness and righteousness, then proceed to convict the souls of
their need for a Savior. Let us not present a plastic Jesus, but
one who bled and died for our sins. If the world does not want
to hear this, and defames us as a result, we are to bear that
cross. Do not let us begin to assure the wicked of their
acceptance with God. If we have a brother who is struggling with
his faith, let us preach Christ so he can believe and have
assurance. Let's not become the Holy Spirit to assure him of
something only the Holy Spirit knows.
And coming to the end of the matter, when we preach Christ, let
us depend on God
for the results. Much of today's gospel depends on psychological
techniques, though while having temporary results, do nothing
for subduing the flesh. More and more people are being misled by
the false gospels spawned by today's gospel, with seemingly
spectacular results. But when we look around after a few
moments, their converts are just as worldly as the devil's own
institutions. Jesus said we would know them by their fruit. If
we would stop paying heed to today's gospel and get about the
business of preaching the message once delivered to the saints,
trusting to God to back his own gospel, we would preach the
truth unafraid of what man thinks is the right way to do it. We
would be assured that our word is not our own, but his who sent
us. Then we would see repentance as the Holy Spirit begins to
convict souls of their shaky standing before a holy and
righteous God.
Let us persuade men, but not with wonderful rhetoric and worldly
entertainment,
but with the bold word of faith that says, "Repent, for the
kingdom of God is
near." Let us believe it ourselves.
For there is no respect of persons with God. For as many as have
sinned without
law shall also perish without law: and as many as have sinned in
the law shall
be judged by the law... In the day when God shall judge the
secrets of men by
Jesus Christ according to my gospel. Romans 2:11,12, 16.
Therefore we labor, that, whether present or absent, we may be
accepted of him.
For we must all appear before the judgment seat of Christ; that
every one may
receive the things done in his body, according to that he hath
done, whether it
be good or bad. Knowing therefore the terror of the Lord, we
persuade men; but
we are made manifest unto God; and I trust also are made
manifest in your
consciences. 2 Corinthians 5:9-11.
Now the end of the commandment is charity out of a pure heart,
and of a good
conscience, and of faith unfeigned: From which some having
swerved have turned
aside unto vain jangling; desiring to be teachers of the law;
understanding neither what they say, nor whereof they affirm.
But we know that the law is good, if a man use it lawfully;
knowing this, that the law is not made for a righteous man, but
for the lawless and disobedient, for the ungodly and for
sinners, for unholy and profane, "for murderers of fathers and
murderers of mothers, for manslayers, for fornicators, for them
that defile themselves with mankind (homosexuals), for
kidnappers, for liars, for perjurers, and whatever else is
contrary to sound doctrine, according to the glorious gospel of
the blessed God, which was committed to my trust. 1 Timothy
1:5-11.
End note: Today's Gospel was first published in 1970, at the
height of the "Jesus People Movement." Evidently, Walter Chantry
was not impressed with the false spirituality attendant with
that movement. The last 35 years have only seen a continued
degradation of the gospel, to the point where many churches are
ordaining homosexuals. They all have the same gospel: "God
loves us just the way we are." About the only two scriptures
they know are John 3:16 and "judge not." If you, the reader,
have fallen into today's gospel, pray to God for mercy that he
may deliver you, because, according to scripture, we will all
stand before the judgment seat of Christ and give an account of
our deeds.
Chris Simonson 3/09/2006 |
| |
 |
|
How Today's
Gospel Differs From The Gospel - Part Three
Jesus knew that the young man was
incapable of fulfilling even one commandment,
and
yet he continued, "But if you will enter into life, keep the
commandments."
The man asks, "Which ones?"
Jesus says, "You know the commandments: 'Do not commit
adultery', 'Do not kill', 'Do not steal', 'Do not bear false
witness', 'Defraud not', 'Honor your father and mother'." In
Matthew he adds, "Thou shalt love thy neighbor as thyself."
The point is that Jesus did not give a quick and easy
how-to-believe-and-be-forgiven sermon. The man asked what was
left in his life to accomplish so that he could have eternal
life. He wanted a quick rundown on how to, same as modern
man. He thought that if only Christ gave him instruction, he
could do it. Jesus, meeting him on that ground, showed him that
if one trusts that he can achieve eternal life by keeping the
Law, then he must obey it perfectly. The only way to break the
curse of the Law, that is, death, is to keep all the
commandments. We know, as true believers, that does not mean
just outward observance of Jewish laws, but something far
greater (Matt. 5:20).
And like his modern counterparts, the rich young man justified
himself and said,
"These things have I kept since my youth." Was Jesus shocked at
this boldness? No, because the man was being honest. According
to the Jewish law, he had observed the various ordinances
without blame, same as Paul (Philippians 3:6). Those youth today
who say they have kept the ten commandments are simply
foolish. They are neither Jewish nor do they even try to keep
the commandments. They definitely do not keep "thou shalt not
bear false witness" when they testify about their own
obedience. Yes, the man may have "observed" or "kept" the law,
but he did not carry out the righteous requirements of the
law. Jesus, however, did.
And this same Jesus did not condemn the man but proceeded to
preach to him the
very thing that he lacked in order to inherit eternal life. The
man had asked, "What else do I lack?" and Jesus was going to
further his understanding. This is the preaching that is so
dearly needed today. We should not shrink back from telling a
person what they lack, but instead, we are running popularity
contests, filling our churches with unrepentant souls. We teach
them all they lack is saying the sinner's prayer, or some
such. I can't but help think that the reason so many pastors are
willing to preach a half-truth is so that they will have a
larger audience to insure a larger income. This is covetousness,
and it is the main sin of American churchianity.
Speaking of covetousness, this is precisely the problem Jesus
centered on in the
young man's life. He was rich. It is interesting that Jesus did
not mention the tenth commandment, "Thou shalt not covet" when
he gave the to-do list of things to inherit eternal
life. Nothing wrong with being rich, we say. Jesus certainly did
not dislike the rich young ruler. Mark says that Jesus
"beholding him loved him". Today's wretched definitions of love
defile the very God who is love. But, the love of God is pure
and holy, and this is the love Jesus had for the rich young
man. So, the next thing Jesus says is purely out of a heart of
love, although it was the very thing that drove the man away
from Christ.
The modern pastors would lick their chops when they found out
about the wealth
and prestige this young man had. They would give him the best
privileges available to the dues-paying parishioners. I've seen
it many times with my own eyes and need hear no empty arguments
to protect the guilty. This man would be saved and baptized and
given the best parking spot.
A case in point: Jack Hayford's
"Church on the Way" had a no-parking zone next to the church
entrance, separate from the rest of the parking lot. No one
could park there, except one, a Pat Boone and his Rolls
Royce. Whenever we pulled up to park, searching in vain for an
empty stall and having to go up the street to overflow parking
as usual, there were hushed tones of admiration as we saw the
Rolls, knowing that inside the church, Pat Boone himself had
again blessed us with his presence. You couldn't get near him,
however, because pastor Jack made sure he sat in a certain place
and was surrounded with a certain clientele. I could give many
more examples, but some of us know these two celebrities. Jack's
preaching is very successful, accommodating itself to today's
gospel.
Jesus, however, said to the young man, "One thing you lack: Go
away, sell everything you own and give to the poor, and you will
have treasure in heaven, then come, take up the cross, and
follow me."
And there you have it, the
preaching of the cross of Christ. This is not the four spiritual
laws, or the eightfold path to enlightenment or a long
philosophical discussion about wealth. It is simply the gospel
of, "Come and follow me." This gospel is not preached in
America, because it involves a cross. If we do not preach the
cross of Christ in its entirety, we are not preaching The
Gospel. It does not matter how much we watch movies about "The
Passion"; if we do not partake of the cross we are not going to
inherit eternal life.
This simple command, "Go and sell everything you have and give
to the poor,"
cannot be found in the commandments. And yet, this is the very
command he had
to obey in order to inherit eternal life. This is probably the
same commandment many who dwell in these United States need to
obey. But they will hang on to their religion, thinking that a
shallow observance of Christian rituals will get them to
heaven. And their pastors will see to that.
And so, the commandment becomes too hard. We are told the young
man went away sorrowful, because he had many possessions. The
Dispensationalists, like Jack
Hayford, will say this whole episode is pre-cross and so has no
real meaning to
eternal life. It is just a great story of something, like how
impossible everything is without the help of God. The rich young
man could have disobeyed the command if only he had waited until
the right dispensation? Then he could live in this dispensation
rich and ruling, going to church and paying is preacher.
Ah, the comforts of today's gospel.
Chris Simonson 3/08/2006 |
| |
 |
|
How Today's
Gospel Differs From The Gospel - Part Two
The preaching of the message given
by the Lord and his apostles is the only way
a
man can be saved. It is the only way the church can be
edified. It is the only way unity of the body of Jesus Christ
can be achieved. All other methods are devilish and it is no
wonder the church has been overrun by doctrines of demons
precisely over the matter of how to present the gospel. So, it
would be good to contrast present-day methods with how the Lord
himself handles souls.
Let us use a Biblical story of how Christ handled an aspiring
follower of eternal life to contrast that with how today's
ministers of today's gospel would handle the same situation.
Looking at Matthew 19:16, Mark 10:17 and Luke 18:18, we see a
man running up to
Jesus and kneeling before him in sincere search for eternal
life. Through his
encounter with the Lord, we learn that he is a ruler, he is rich
and he is young. If such a man came forward at one of our
evangelism outreaches, with such credentials and with such an
attitude of humility and sincerity, we would unhesitatingly make
him a member of our church (after a brief explanation of the
four spiritual laws and the liturgy of the "sinner's prayer" of
course). What a catch for the Lord!
Instead, Jesus sends the man away sorrowful. Quite a contrast.
Jesus preached, "Come to me... All those who come to me I will
in no wise cast
out." However, his disciples didn't want children hanging
around and bothering him, but he took them and blessed them
anyway and said, "Of such is the kingdom of heaven" Mark 10:14.
Then the rich, young ruler ran up
to him and asked what he could do to obtain eternal life.
According to today's gospel, this would be a perfect setup for a
simple confession of faith. It is true that Jesus said to the
young man, "Come and follow me", but he had first laid some
conditions on the man that made him walk away with no eternal
life? The story of the fish that got away from Jesus.
We can do no better. If our gospel catches fish that Jesus
himself would not catch, then we are arrogant boasters of a
greater love than that of our Savior. And, this is what we see
in Christendom today, a proliferation of self-accolades on how
wonderful this or that technique worked to catch a thousand
souls in the net of our corporate fishing fleet. We hear that
they "decided for Christ", but we cannot tell what they decided.
When the man ran up to Jesus and kneeled, he showed some
reverence, far more
than the youth of today. He addressed Jesus as, "Good Master".
This is a wonderful recognition of Who Jesus Is, we might think,
but we had better think twice. He asked, "Good Master, what
shall I do that I may inherit eternal life?" What a wonderful
question! How many times do we see such zeal for the things of
the soul today? Usually, the question is more like, "What shall
I do that I may be popular? or rich? or happy?"
But Jesus was determined to preach the gospel to this man.
First, he did not give him the four spiritual laws. No, Jesus
gave him the Law of Moses. "Why do you call me good? There is
none good but one, that is, God." In saying this, he recalls the
first commandment, "Hear, O Israel; The Lord our God is one
Lord." Jesus knew something about this man we do not at first
see. We know the first commandment says, "You shall have no
other gods before me."
Outwardly, the man showed great
devotion to God, but evidently he did not understand the
goodness of God that leads to repentance. "God is good", we say,
but do we even understand what we are saying? Was the young man
at fault for calling Jesus good? We know that Jesus is the Holy
One of God, and that he is, like his Father, good. But it
appears that the young ruler's belief was shallow, and so were
his words. "Good Master", he said, but did he really mean it?
Did he really mean it when he said, "What must I do to inherit
eternal life?" We will see.
But, first, let us examine what today's gospel would make of the
question. We
hear from many preachers that there is nothing we can do to
inherit eternal life except believe, of course. They fail to
mention that we must believe properly and that if we do not
understand Christ we will lose any hope of eternal life. They
spend little or no time describing the necessity of proper
belief, skipping to the formulaic "sinner's prayer" or some
such. They spend no time on the holy Law of God, thinking this
will drive people away from Christ. They spend as little time as
possible on the attributes of a holy and righteous God, who will
by no means clear the guilty. They make up doctrines that "God
loves you just the way you are" or "God loves us
unconditionally" in order to manipulate by emotion the simple
minded. By the time they describe Jesus, it is a Jesus stripped
of holiness, purity, justice, judgment, and all the other
attributes of God. Their approach to God is stripped of
reverence, and talk as they might of God's mercy and love, it is
a casual thing not linked to his judgment upon sinners.
But when Christ handles the scriptures and the souls, he is far
more reverential. He says, first of all, "Why do you call me
good? There is none good but one, that is, God." The very first
part of the gospel is to present God as distinct from everything
or everyone else, the Creator of all and the only good. Although
Jesus knew who he is, he emptied himself and gave only his
Father the glory, thus perfectly fulfilling the first
commandment.
Chris Simonson 3/07/2006 |
| |
 |
How Today's
Gospel Differs From The Gospel - Part One
Much of the material in this article is derived from the small
book, Today's Gospel,
Authentic
or Synthetic? by Walter J. Chantry, published by The Banner
of Truth Trust. I highly recommend it. I wish that all pastors
would read it and take it to heart, as well as any layman
interested in his own soul.
Today's gospel is not the gospel as preached by Jesus Christ or
his apostles. That bold statement needs to be backed with a
comparison of the two. This we will attempt.
We all agree that unity of the body of Christ is crucial,
especially when it comes to preaching the gospel. A house
divided against itself cannot stand. We do not agree on how that
unity is to be achieved, however, and Jude discusses this when
he says, "you should earnestly contend for the faith which was
delivered once and for all to the saints, because there are
certain men crept in unawares." In modern attempt to unify the
church, we have become dead to the gospel that gives the body
life.
Many have crept into the church
over the last two thousand years and today, many churches have a
name that they are alive but are quite dead (Rev. 3:1). Our dead
churches have tried every gimmick to look lively and present a
gospel to a dying world. But they have neglected the sword of
the Spirit, the word of God, in their
presentations. Only the word is alive and powerful, but they
have attempted to
present themselves and their methodologies as able to impart
life.
This they cannot do. Instead of
glorifying the God whom they profess to know, they have reduced
him to a shredded string of platitudes and slogans, strung along
with
shallow faith and even shallower service to God. While
professing to know God,
they deny him by their works, which turn the grace of our God to
lasciviousness.
The only unity that can be achieved when the churches are in
this state of shame is one of devilish union with the world.
Jesus came to gather his sheep out of the world. When we read
John 3:16, do we
pay attention to the rest of the gospel that says, "A man can
receive nothing, except it be given him from heaven", and "No
man can come to me, except the Father which hath sent me draw
him", and "You do not believe because you are not of my
sheep...My sheep hear my voice, and I know them, and they follow
me", and "Ye have not chosen me, but I have chosen you, and
ordained you", and "Thou hast given him power over all flesh,
that he should give eternal life to as many as thou hast given
him?" John 3:27, 6:44, 10:26-27, 15:16, 17:2.
To sum up, we do not save anyone by
our own efforts or by our own will, but only those to whom
salvation is appointed. Many have separated over this point of
doctrine, but the sheep hear their master's voice regardless.
Chris Simonson 3/06/2006 |
| |
 |
Who Give Two Cents For Christ?
The facts are in: you give two cents for Christ; If you are a
regular church-going
American
you can proudly boast you give two cents out of every dollar for
Christ.
In America, prior to the Great Depression, churches were the
main source of giving to families and persons in need. In other
words funds given to churches through tithes, giving, etc were
dispersed in evangelism, missions, aiding local people in need
(often called ‘benevolences’) and in feeding the hungry around
the world.
But, in 1935 the churches seemed to receive a small windfall
through the proclamation of FDR’s New Deal, which encouraged the
federal government to give financial and food aid to families in
need, otherwise known as AFDC; this program probably provided a
little extra money for steeple repairs or pew replacement. 1970
brought sweeping reform to the AFDC program, when the Supreme
Court ruled that AFDC was now an entitlement to all Americans;
this change allowed a flood of funding for the program, thus
alleviating the churches in America of the large burden of
caring for the widows, orphans and fatherless.
According to several online resources, 1965 began the trend of
Church Building in
America spawned by the sudden popularity of Christianity among
the younger
generation, and a flow of new capital. The 1970's saw a rise in
larger and larger
church buildings to house these growing congregations. In the
1980's the idea of
church ‘campuses’ began to take hold, with sprawling designs and
extensive staffing.
In 2002, churches accounted for $21 billion of the $152 billion
spent on nonresidential
construction, according to McGraw-Hill, which analyzes the
construction industry; and even as overall construction leveled
off during the previous five years, church
construction continued to rise. However, all of this building is
despite church growth
stagnation, as average congregation membership has stayed around
45%. In other
words, modern christendom in America loves it’s religion and
buildings more that it’s people.
In 1968, 21˘ of every dollar donated was allocated to
Benevolences, or helping local
families or persons in need. By 2003, 15˘ of every dollar went
to Benevolences. Of
each additional inflation-adjusted dollar donated to the church
between 1968 and
2003, 94˘ went to Congregational Finances.
So, what do churches do with their money? According to
EmptyTomb.org: in 1920,
the percentage of giving to missions from the total offering was
10.09 percent, just
over a dime out of every dollar. In 2003, conservative and
evangelical denominations gave 2.6 percent (about three cents
per dollar), with the liberals giving only 0.9 percent (one
cent). The combined average for overseas evangelical work is
about two pennies per dollar.
According to an article by Gene Edward Veith, if church members
today actually
tithed just 10% of their income, there would be an additional
$156 Billion dollars
available for Benevolences (caring for families in need), and if
just 60% percent of
that went to overseas evangelical missions, the $94 Billion
dollars would be enough to feed, clothe, medicate and preach the
Gospel of Jesus Christ to the entire
underdeveloped world.
According to the Bible Jesus had no place to lay His head,
however, He was 100%
effective in His ministry, His Word, His death, burial and
resurrection. In sharp
contrast, today’s Christianity is bathed in royal excess. The
reality of the situation is
“it’s business as usual” at your local modern-church: there is a
boast of "Christ’s love" but no real evidence of it; all they
have to show for their efforts is corporations, buildings and
plenty of cash.
They say: “Oh we give to the suffering church and the poor
fatherless, widows and
orphans and to the preaching of the Gospel...”; yeah, a whopping
two pennies’
worth of giving, which is even less than the Pharisees gave.
In other words, the modern 'christian' church in America strains
at a gnat and swallows a camel.
“5. Perverse disputings of men of corrupt minds, and
destitute of the truth,
supposing that gain is godliness: from such withdraw
thyself.6.But godliness with
contentment is great gain. 7.For we brought nothing into [this]
world, [and it is]
certain we can carry nothing out. 8. And having food and raiment
let us be
therewith content. 9. But they that will be rich fall into
temptation and a snare,
and [into] many foolish and hurtful lusts, which drown men in
destruction and
perdition. 10.For the love of money is the root of all evil:
which while some
coveted after, they have erred from the faith, and pierced
themselves through
with many sorrows. 11. But thou, O man of God, flee these
things; and follow after
righteousness, godliness, faith, love, patience, meekness.” 1
Timothy 6:5-11
Steven 3/03/2006 |
| |
 |
|
Blessed are the Peacemakers - Part
Three
The great peacemaker, Jesus Christ,
said, "Woe to you, Chorazin! Woe to you,
Bethsaida! For if the mighty works which were done in
you
had been done in Tyre and Sidon, they would have repented long
ago in sackcloth and ashes. But I say to you, it will be more
tolerable for Tyre and Sidon in the day of judgment than for
you. And you, Capernaum, who are exalted to heaven, will be
brought down to Hades; for if the mighty works which were done
in you had been done in Sodom, it would have remained until this
day. But I say to you that it shall be more tolerable for the
land of Sodom in the day of judgment than for you!" Matthew
11:21-24.
These do not sound like the
peaceful sayings of a narcotic far east religion.
When Jesus said, "Blessed are the peacemakers", he was not
speaking of
anesthesiologists in a clean operating room. Peace comes at the
price of blood, and the battlefield serves as the
hospital. Jesus rebuke those cities who had seen his works, and
he rebukes us who have grown up with the gospel all around us.
If we think to ourselves he didn't mean us, we 21st century
Americans who grew up with Billy Graham and Bibles galore, then
we are surely on central nervous system depressants falsely
labeled "peace pills". No wonder we are on so many drugs,
Christians.
The peacemakers of whom Jesus spoke in Matthew 5:9 must be
something other than wimpy yes-men. Jesus speaks of peace with
God. There is a reconciliation
necessary between a man and his God. God can't be bought off by
religious rituals, however. Jesus said, "Therefore if you bring
your gift to the altar, and there remember that your brother has
something against you, leave your gift there before the altar,
and go your way. First be reconciled to your brother, and then
come and offer your gift" Matthew 5:23-24.
There is a reconciliation necessary between a man and his
brother. You will not
be at peace with God until you have paid your brother back what
is owed to him.
Let's not be trite. If you have burned your brother by stealing
from him, return the money. If you have slept with his wife, you
must make some kind of amends. Don't go down to the church and
attend a marriage retreat, for crying out loud. Go to your
brother and plead for you life, because God will avenge him if
you don't repent. If you have insulted him publicly, then you
must publicly apologize. If you have been a hypocrite and told
him to do something you refuse to do yourself, or have told him
not to do something you freely commit, then go to him and
confess. Cry out to God for mercy. If you have been gossiping
about the brother, go and tell him to his face what you think of
him and confess. If you can't figure out how to repent to your
brother, then I suggest you beg of Christ to forgive your
hardheartedness and your pretense of love. Until you figure out
how to forgive and how to repent yourself, then you will not be
forgiven. There will be no peace and no peacemaking until then.
So, before we go preaching about how another person ought to be
making peace
with the world by dead works consisting of friendship evangelism
and "marriage counseling", we ought to examine ourselves and see
if we are in the faith and whether we have been reconciled to
God through Christ.
Only then will the saying, "Blessed are the peacemakers", apply
to us.
Chris Simonson 3/02/3006 |
| |
 |
|
Blessed are the Peacemakers - Part Two
So how does Jesus bring peace to
the earth? We hear around Christmas time how
the
angels said, "Peace on earth and good will to men", but do the
earth and its men receive God's peace? If peacemakers are so
blessed, then why didn't the Colt "Peacemaker" gun bring a
blessing? Of course, it all depends on what one means by
"peacemaker".
Jesus brought peace to earth. But he was crucified because he
preached good will to men. God's good will to men is that they
will hear the message of peace and repent of their sins. Jesus
did not come into the world to judge the world, but that the
world may be saved through him, said John. This John also quotes
Jesus as saying, "For judgment have I come into the world, that
those who do not see may see, and those who see may be made
blind". So did Jesus come to bring peace or a sword? Did he come
to save or to judge?
That's where the wisdom of men fail them. They cannot, repeat,
cannot, come
to Christ unless the Father draws them to Christ. And this is
where they stop short of salvation. They want a peace that is
not God's peace. They want a love that is not God's love. They
quote the proverb above that says, "Hatred stirs up strife, but
love covers all sins", but they are willingly ignorant of the
proverb that says, "He that covers his sins shall not prosper:
but whoso confesses and forsakes them shall have mercy" Proverbs
28:13.
He who covers sin without blame is God. This is the only way sin
can be covered. He is not covering his own sin, but the sin of
his chosen ones. He has also given us the ministry of
reconciling men to their God. The psalmist says, "Blessed is he
whose transgression is forgiven, whose sin is covered", and,
"Thou hast forgiven the iniquity of thy people, thou hast
covered all their sin. Selah." Psalm 32:1, Psalm 85:2.
The wicked say peace when there is no peace. "To wit, the
prophets of Israel which prophesy concerning Jerusalem, and
which see visions of peace for her, and there is no peace, saith
the Lord GOD." Ezekiel 13:16. "For when they shall say, "Peace
and safety!" then sudden destruction comes upon them, as travail
upon a woman with child; and they shall not escape." 1
Thessalonians 5:3.
This is a false peace, professed by
the false brethren and their false prophets. "They have healed
also the hurt of the daughter of my people slightly, saying,
"Peace, peace!" when there is no peace." Jeremiah 6:14
These hypocrites actually war against Christ and against his
saints, speaking lies and pretending to love God. "Thus saith
the LORD concerning the prophets that make my people err, that
bite with their teeth, and cry, "Peace!"", a word He did not put
into their mouths, "they even prepare war against him..." Micah
3:5.
These are not peacemakers, but
divide the brethren with smooth-sounding words, with great
swelling words of prophetic utterance by which they tickle the
ears and take away the truth. These are two of the things that
God hates: "A false witness that speaks lies, and he that sows
discord among brethren." Proverbs 6:19
Chris Simonson 3/01/2006 |
|
|